Key Points
October is the key month for designing the 2027 variable compensation plan for sales representatives: nine months of actual performance provide a reliable basis for assessment, and there are twelve weeks remaining for implementation by January 1—the date by which targets must be communicated to be legally enforceable. With 2027 pay increase budgets remaining modest in France (2.5% according to Mercer, 3% according to WTW), the variable component is becoming the primary tool for differentiating sales representatives. An effective plan rests on five key decisions (fixed/variable mix, metrics, targets, pay scale, and management rules) and must now incorporate pay transparency, which also applies to variable compensation.
The situation in 2027 is unusual. Pay increase budgets remain modest: the Mercer survey of 277 companies based in France puts the median budget at 2.5 percent, while WTW’s Salary Budget Planning study puts it at 3 percent. At the same time, the trend toward individualized pay is accelerating: 97% of the companies surveyed by WTW take individual performance into account, and only 17% implemented across-the-board raises this year, compared to 61% in 2025.
In other words, base pay is increasing only slightly, and performance is now the main factor driving differentiation. For sales teams, this factor is variable compensation. And it’s being established right now.
Why is October the right time to review sales representatives' compensation?
October is the only month when we have both reliable data for the current year and the time needed to implement a new plan effective January 1. There are three reasons for this.
- Visibility into the final stretch. With nine months under our belt, the breakdown of goal achievement by sales representative, segment, and product is robust enough to be analyzed. In June, it’s too early; in December, it’s too late.
- The budget timeline. The 2027 budget allocations are finalized between October and November. A variable-funding plan that has not been quantified at this stage will be allocated a default amount, often simply carrying over the existing budget.
- Legal Requirements. Under French law, the targets on which a variable pay component is based must be achievable and must be communicated to the employee at the beginning of the fiscal year. Otherwise, case law from the Court of Cassation holds that variable compensation is due, generally based on the maximum amount provided for or the previous year’s target. A plan approved in February therefore exposes the company to a real risk of litigation.
We’d like to add a fourth factor, one that’s more behavioral in nature: the final quarter is when all sales decisions are made. Depending on whether the 2027 plan is known, anticipated, or unknown, some salespeople rush to close deals, while others postpone them until January to secure their next fiscal year. The quality of communication regarding the future plan directly influences year-end revenue.
What metrics should be analyzed before redesigning a variable compensation plan?
A solid plan for 2027 starts with a quantitative assessment of the 2026 plan, not with a discussion of commission rates. We recommend examining six indicators, in this order.
| Indicator | What it reveals | Warning Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution of Goal Achievement | The Appropriateness of Quotas | Less than 50% or more than 80% of salespeople are on target |
| Cost of Sales (Variable Expenses / Revenue) | The effectiveness of the system | Costs are rising faster than revenue |
| Variable Correlation / Performance | The plan's ability to differentiate | Top performers and average salespeople are paid similarly |
| Portion of the variable compensation attributable to exceptional events | The "windfall" component | One or two contracts account for most of the cost overruns |
| Turnover among salespeople, especially the top performers | The appeal of the package | Departures are concentrated in the first quartile |
| Gender Differences in Variables | Exposure to Transparency Risk | Difference not explained by the achievement of objectives |
This analysis makes it possible to distinguish between two very different situations: a poorly calibrated plan (quotas, rates, caps), which can be corrected through adjustments, and a poorly designed plan (metrics that are ill-suited to the sales strategy), which requires a complete overhaul.
What are the key decisions involved in developing a sales compensation plan for 2027?
An effective variable pricing plan is based on five decisions, made in a specific order: the sales strategy determines the payment mechanisms—never the other way around.
- The fixed/variable pay mix. It depends on the extent to which the sales representative influences the sale. The longer, more collaborative, and more technical the sales cycle, the higher the fixed portion should be. Market research indicates, for example, that the variable portion of a key account sales representative’s compensation ranges from 15 to 50 percent, depending on the industry (Michael Page): this wide range shows that there is no standard—only choices consistent with a particular sales model.
- Performance metrics. Revenue, margin, new customers, retention, product mix: We recommend limiting the number of metrics to no more than three; otherwise, the plan loses its clarity and its ability to guide decision-making. Each metric must be measurable, within the sales representative’s control, and aligned with a specific 2027 priority.
- Setting objectives. This is the most common point of weakness. A quota based simply on rolling over the previous year’s results plus X% penalizes already mature territories and rewards underutilized ones. Objectives must take into account the actual potential of each portfolio and remain achievable within the meaning of case law.
- The compensation curve. Trigger threshold, accelerators beyond 100%, decelerators, cap: this is the curve that translates managerial intent into behavior. A cap that is too low discourages top performers; no cap at all exposes the company to costly windfalls. A clause for handling exceptional cases is often the best solution.
- Frequency and management rules. Monthly, quarterly, or annual payments; handling of additions and removals during the year; reallocation of accounts; and credits shared among multiple vendors: these rules, which are often addressed last, are the source of most disputes and the loss of confidence in the system.
These five decisions must be simulated before being finalized: What will the plan cost if the company reaches 90%, 100%, or 120% of its budget? How much does a top-quartile sales rep earn compared to a median sales rep? Without this modeling, the plan remains a gamble.
Discover the white paper on NAO and pay transparency
Anticipate the impact of the directive on pay transparency and ensure your next annual collective bargaining negotiations are consistent and successful.
How does pay transparency affect salespeople's variable compensation?
Pay transparency applies to total compensation, including variable pay: commission and bonus plans fall fully within its scope. The bill transposing Directive (EU) 2023/970 was presented to the Council of Ministers on September 10, 2026, and has yet to be considered by Parliament. France has missed the transposition deadline, which was set for June 7, 2026.
Three concrete implications for the 2027 business plans:
- Metrics specific to variable compensation. Among the metrics specified by the directive are the gender pay gap for variable compensation and the proportion of women and men receiving variable compensation. A sales force with little gender diversity, or unbalanced rules for assigning sales portfolios, become apparent.
- An objective justification for pay disparities. The text reverses the burden of proof: in the event of a dispute, it is up to the employer to demonstrate that pay differences are based on objective, non-sexist criteria. Documented quotas and a traceable method for assigning territories serve as supporting evidence.
- Rules that everyone is familiar with. The criteria for setting and adjusting compensation must be made available to employees. An opaque plan, adjusted on a case-by-case basis at the end of the year, will not meet this requirement.
The timeline for adoption remains uncertain, but the direction of the reform does not. A plan developed in October 2026 will be implemented throughout 2027; therefore, it must be “transparency-ready” from the outset.
What is the timeline for implementing a new variable pay plan effective January 1?
It takes about twelve weeks from diagnosis to the issuance of the goal letters. Here is the schedule we recommend for a calendar year.
- October: Assessment. Analysis of the 2026 plan based on the six indicators above; interviews with sales leadership and several front-line managers; identification of sales priorities for 2027.
- Late October through mid-November: design and modeling. Optimization of the mix, indicators, and payment curve; cost and distribution simulations across multiple achievement scenarios.
- Mid-November through early December: approval. Budget coordination with the finance department, legal review (employment contracts, any amendments), and notification and consultation with the Social and Economic Committee (CSE) when the change requires it.
- December: Preparation for deployment. Drafting of plan guidelines, configuration of calculation tools, and training of managers on how to present and defend objectives.
- January: Communication. Distribute individual performance goal letters, ideally during the sales kick-off, before the start of any performance measurement period.
For companies with a non-standard fiscal year, this schedule is adjusted based on the start date of the fiscal year: the 12-week rule remains the same.
What mistakes should you avoid when setting compensation for salespeople?
Most variable-based plans that fail do not suffer from a lack of generosity, but from a lack of consistency. The five mistakes we see most often are:
- Roll over the default plan. A plan designed for a customer acquisition strategy continues to prioritize acquisition even after the company has shifted its focus to customer retention or profit margins.
- Don't use too many metrics. If there are more than three criteria, each one carries too little weight to influence behavior, and the sales rep no longer knows what really matters.
- Changing the rules midway through the year— whether by raising a quota or capping a variable component after the fact—permanently erodes trust and exposes the company to legal risks.
- Communicating objectives too late. Objectives issued in March for a fiscal year that began in January undermine the effectiveness of the program.
- Forget about managers. A plan that managers cannot explain or defend will be perceived as arbitrary, regardless of its technical merit.
When should sales representatives be informed of their performance targets?
At the beginning of the fiscal year, before the start of the performance measurement period. Case law holds that if performance goals are not communicated in a timely manner or are unachievable, employees are entitled to receive the variable pay, often based on the maximum amount provided for.
What is the right balance between fixed and variable pay for a sales representative?
There is no universal ratio. The variable portion should be higher the more the sales representative alone determines the outcome of the sale. For a key account sales representative, market practices range from 15 to 50 percent, depending on the industry.
How many metrics should be included in a commission plan?
No more than three. Beyond that, the weight of each indicator becomes too small to guide business behavior, and the plan becomes less clear.
Does pay transparency apply to variable compensation?
Yes. Directive (EU) 2023/970 covers all compensation, including variable components, and sets out specific indicators regarding gender gaps in variable pay. In France, the draft law to transpose the directive has been under parliamentary review since September 2026.
Is it possible to modify a variable compensation plan during the year?
This is strongly discouraged. If the variable portion is specified in a contract, any change to it requires the employee’s consent. Even when the employer unilaterally sets the objectives, a change during the fiscal year undermines trust and the legal certainty of the system.
What budget increase should we plan for in 2027?
Market research indicates that the median pay raise for 2027 in France will range from 2.5% (Mercer) to 3% (WTW), with a clear preference for individual raises. For sales representatives, variable compensation remains the primary differentiator.
Key Takeaways
Sales representatives’ compensation for 2027 will be determined this fall. With limited budgets for raises, increasing individualization, and the advent of pay transparency, the variable compensation plan is becoming both the primary driver of sales performance and a source of legal and social risk. Assessing it in October, modeling it in November, and communicating it in January is not merely a matter of method—it is essential to its effectiveness.
MCR Rewards supports senior management, HR, and sales departments in designing, modeling, and implementing their sales compensation plans—from assessing existing plans to training managers. We integrate each plan into a comprehensive, equitable compensation strategy that is ready for pay transparency, consistent with your C&B policy, your incentive programs, and your job evaluation system.
